User talk:Mishac
Welcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 06:08, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Stub vs. Not-Stub
[edit]Great post! Apparently anything more than a paragraph is a short article, but not a stub. So you're a-okay. Welcome! jengod 04:10, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
Primates
[edit]Thanks for jumpng in on sme of the Primate pages. Want to list yourself as a contributor to the Project? - UtherSRG 06:16, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
- I'd like to, but I don't know if I want the responsiblity :) I'd rather contribute unofficially for now :) --Mishac 06:21, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Hi Mishac, nice to meet you. About the primate project links: I removed them because Wikipedia article space is devoted entirely to the subject matter itself. Links to things like the WikiProjects go through the talk pages. So it's not that the promate project links are wrong, just that they are in the wrong place.
Now you are probably scratching your head just now and wondering where the sense in that is. It's discussed at length on a Wikiproject talk page somewhere. Hang on, I'll try to find it. ... Yes, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life. I'll quote Mav from it - that should give you the idea.
- these links will only be useful to Wikipedia editors. They are at best useless and at worst distracting for readers -- especially readers who are reading a non-editable version of the article (which includes nearly every single downstream user - except Wikipedia forks). Best then to just put the links at the top of talk pages (where actual editors hang out to discuss how to improve the article - part of that is conformance to the WikiProject it falls under). No reason to expose readers to the guts of the article creation process. That is metadata and that is what talk pages are for (notice that talk pages are not linked from the body text of articles either).
Anyway, the long and the short of it is that the links belong to the talk space, not the article space. Apart from that, they are fine.
But while I'm at it, let me mention two other things. First, a repeat of Uther's invitation to join the project. No minimum level of commitment is required, you can do as much or as little as you please, and the moral support is always welcome. But it's no big deal - contribute formally or informally, either way it's welcome.
Second, a more general remark about taxoboxes: the aim, in broad, is to keep them as short and tidy as possible. Burdening them with extra cells is to be avoided unless that info is really important. My own belief is that we should have an additional cell in all the taxoboxes, but that that cell should report the conservation status of the creature. (Or the plant, as appropriate.) But that's just my point of view. As time goes by I hope to persuade other editors to agree on this one, and given a consensus in favour, we can implement it. But I won't be doing anything unless there is general agreement first.
Cheers -- Tannin 10:45, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
PS: I guess someone should change the WikiProject page. -- T
Hi Mishac, Thanks for pointing me to the primates project. The article on Catarrhini was my first edit ever in the wikipedia, i wasn't aware of the project then. Next time i'll use the search function before i edit wildly :-)). Lady Tenar
Primates category rework
[edit]After some good discussion on the talk for WP:PRIM with User:Marskell, I've begun work on cleaning up category:Early hominids. Please come to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Primates/category rework to weigh in your opinion on what direction to take. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Meganekko
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Meganekko, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meganekko. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Shinobu (talk) 13:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Mishac. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mishac. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)